I thought the only downfall of selectable stored procedures was that if
you joined to something else it would not use any indexes. I might be
wrong or out of date though. With that said, however, we don't use
views anymore because of the lack of altering.

-steve

On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 22:20 +1000, Grant Brown wrote:

> >> I often use selectable stored procedures instead of views.
>
> OK - I thought I was missing out on something, but I do everything
> with
> selectable SP's
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]