Subject | Re: [firebird-support] * - ? |
---|---|
Author | David Johnson |
Post date | 2005-06-27T19:22:01Z |
I'm not sure it's appropriate to get into a side-debate of the merits of
old-style implicit joins versus new-style explicit joins. Both are
supported by SQL standard and by Firebird.
The argument of which will get you shot depends on the shop you're at.
While I personally prefer explicit joins, my shop's standards dictate
implicit joins "for clarity". You should have seen the panic when I
used a full join, which can only be done explicitly! :o)
old-style implicit joins versus new-style explicit joins. Both are
supported by SQL standard and by Firebird.
The argument of which will get you shot depends on the shop you're at.
While I personally prefer explicit joins, my shop's standards dictate
implicit joins "for clarity". You should have seen the panic when I
used a full join, which can only be done explicitly! :o)
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:15 -0400, Jason Dodson wrote:
> Woody (TMW) wrote:
> > From: "Joe Martinez" <joe@...>
> >
... snip ...
> >
> > Select a.*, b.FieldOne from TableA a, TableB b
> > where a.SomeField = b.SomeField
> >
>
> Joining that way will get you shot... or worse.
>