Subject | Re: Hungarian collations for 1.03? |
---|---|
Author | plinehan |
Post date | 2005-06-23T11:08:28Z |
In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com,
"Ivan Prenosil" <Ivan.Prenosil@s...> wrote:
To me, it appears that it does *_NOT_* do a true
Hungarian dictionary collation, since it does not
separate (o, รณ), from (o:, o//), i.e. it does
not separate (straight o, o acute) from
(o diaersis, o double acute).
It appears to me that it does exactly what
the WIN_1250 PXW_HUNDC does, which, of course,
is wrong.
I'm going to try with 1.52, but I would really
prefer to use 1.03. I need to know if anybody
has managed to get this working in 1.03.
If indeed somebody does have it working, then
I will look at my own system, but if not, maybe
it's a bug in 1.03?
TIA.
Paul...
"Ivan Prenosil" <Ivan.Prenosil@s...> wrote:
> In system tables you can see these charsets/collations:Does anybody actually have this working in FB 1.03?
> DOS852 - PDOX_HUN
> WIN1250 - PXW_HUNDC
> WIN1250 - PXW_HUN ... new in FB1
To me, it appears that it does *_NOT_* do a true
Hungarian dictionary collation, since it does not
separate (o, รณ), from (o:, o//), i.e. it does
not separate (straight o, o acute) from
(o diaersis, o double acute).
It appears to me that it does exactly what
the WIN_1250 PXW_HUNDC does, which, of course,
is wrong.
I'm going to try with 1.52, but I would really
prefer to use 1.03. I need to know if anybody
has managed to get this working in 1.03.
If indeed somebody does have it working, then
I will look at my own system, but if not, maybe
it's a bug in 1.03?
TIA.
Paul...