Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Firebird & cluster |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2005-06-21T19:59:46Z |
Yves Glodt wrote:
won't run on it.
side that pages have to be transfered through disk when two connections
are both updating them. SuperServer was designed to be a performance
boost because it manages a shared cache and reduces the I/O load.
Regards,
Ann
>Unless the cluster provides shared memory for the lock manager, Firebird
> does anybody have some experience in running firebird (classic) in an
> Openmosix or Rocks cluster?
won't run on it.
>What else have you tried to increase performance? Classic has the down
> Wee need a performance improvement for a project where about 30-50
> concurrent users are hitting a 4GB database. We are using classic server
> as the server is a dual-processor machine.
side that pages have to be transfered through disk when two connections
are both updating them. SuperServer was designed to be a performance
boost because it manages a shared cache and reduces the I/O load.
Regards,
Ann