Subject | Re: Firebird database structure question |
---|---|
Author | lysander_fb |
Post date | 2005-06-10T20:20:24Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Svein Erling Tysvær
<svein.erling.tysvaer@k...> wrote:
Firebird, and I really like what I see and experience, this statement
needs a bit of correction. I have been writing successful network
applications with dBase for more than 10 years, and did not have one
case of corruption in my own network.
Those cases I saw in other applications ALWAYS were because of very
bad mistakes in database- and applicationdesign, and those 'designers'
would surely be capable to crash a Firebird server with the twist of
one finger...
ciao,
André
<svein.erling.tysvaer@k...> wrote:
> ...one of the benefits ofwhile I am here because I am enhancing and converting FROM dBase TO
> Firebird not being dBase is that Firebird is far more robust and that
> corruption rarely occurs unless there is some sort of disk problem
Firebird, and I really like what I see and experience, this statement
needs a bit of correction. I have been writing successful network
applications with dBase for more than 10 years, and did not have one
case of corruption in my own network.
Those cases I saw in other applications ALWAYS were because of very
bad mistakes in database- and applicationdesign, and those 'designers'
would surely be capable to crash a Firebird server with the twist of
one finger...
ciao,
André