Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 2.0 Indexing |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2005-06-05T05:23:19Z |
At 08:48 AM 5/06/2005 +0400, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
(if you must) pissing contents regarding the supposed relative merits of
various different database engines - do NOT belong in this list.
Any thread with "Firebird 2.0" in it also does NOT belong in this list.
Once more, I insist that people follow the rules for our lists, which are
clearly described on the website. Firebird-support is a *support* forum,
for folk who are using *released* Firebird versions. Please keep the
channels clear for that.
^heLen
>"Daniel Rail" <daniel@...> wrote:Just to supplement Dmitry's point - architectural discussions, including
> >
> > And, the idea can be submitted for discussion on the
> > Firebird-Architect@yahoogroups.com
>
>It was asked and answered too many times, so I don't think it's worth
>discussing more.
(if you must) pissing contents regarding the supposed relative merits of
various different database engines - do NOT belong in this list.
Any thread with "Firebird 2.0" in it also does NOT belong in this list.
Once more, I insist that people follow the rules for our lists, which are
clearly described on the website. Firebird-support is a *support* forum,
for folk who are using *released* Firebird versions. Please keep the
channels clear for that.
^heLen