Subject | Re: Firebird 2.0 Indexing |
---|---|
Author | buppcpp |
Post date | 2005-06-01T22:31:49Z |
> We expect that other performance improvements will mask the costof SMP
> support in V3, even on single CPU systems. On the other hand, thedatabases. If
> design target of Firebird is high-concurrency read/write
> your application targets single user, read/only access, you mightWith all due respect Ann, how will adding more user to the database
> consider a different database.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Ann
help with this problem, it seems like it will only make it worst.
Also the system that I want to use Firebird with scales from 1 user/
1 store to 60 users * 150 stores.
We are trying to avoid going to SQL Server (because of cost) and
wanted to try to give IBPhoenix our business.
You and I have talked before about us becoming a (paying) customer.
But, as far as Firebirds' design target of high-concurrency
read/write databases. It seems pretty hard to reach that if
Firebird is crawling under a single-user.