Subject | Re: Character set ISO8859_1 with UPPER function problem |
---|---|
Author | dimkraska |
Post date | 2005-05-29T19:00:36Z |
Hello Pavel,
but the users need to restrict them with more filters.
I'll modify my application to use UPPER with collate filtering as the
most useful solution.
Many thanks for the help.
Best regards,
Vadim Kharsko
AVEST plc.
http://www.avest.by
>I prefer to useIt's a good idea!
> domains and define collations in them - then you can recreate the
> database with another character set and collations via script, for
> example).
> As I understand, it is not recommended to use selectable storedMy stored procedures are already restricted via input parameters,
> procedures in the way you do: it is recommended to restrict the
> procedure output and order the data inside the procedure, otherwise FB
> has to retrieve all rows from the SP, and then filter and order them.
but the users need to restrict them with more filters.
> And inside the SP you could use UPPER, etc. without problems if youYes, it is.
> defined collations for tables fields.
> d> Maybe there is the way to setup one collation order for allobjects in
> d> database?I prefer not to change system tables.
> Probably changing the system tables directly, but it may be unsafe.
I'll modify my application to use UPPER with collate filtering as the
most useful solution.
Many thanks for the help.
Best regards,
Vadim Kharsko
AVEST plc.
http://www.avest.by