Subject | Re: How to shut down FB SS |
---|---|
Author | lysander_fb |
Post date | 2005-05-26T09:49:27Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...>
wrote:
Yes, I did install CLASSIC because in your book (thanks for the work),
I was reading that it's a good choice for a
"firebird-server-only"-machine, if it has enough RAM and a fast processor.
Transactions are okay, something like 2 or 3 only between active and
interesting.
Processes are still running on the server, when already for several
hours nobody is connected anymore to the databases.
I have a 40 clients-network, with 4 databases on 1 server. makes
around 150-160 open connections all the time, each taking about 5MByte
RAM in average.
I am connecting with my old application via ODBC until I rewrote the
application to using D7 and FIBPlus.
Any more ideas?
If not, i will try asking in another group. This situation already
lasts for 10 weeks but I don't experience any downside of any kind. It
only kinda makes me nervous... :)
ciao,
André
wrote:
> You do understand that that statement was in reference to Classicserver
> instances?Thanks for your time and answer.
Yes, I did install CLASSIC because in your book (thanks for the work),
I was reading that it's a good choice for a
"firebird-server-only"-machine, if it has enough RAM and a fast processor.
Transactions are okay, something like 2 or 3 only between active and
interesting.
Processes are still running on the server, when already for several
hours nobody is connected anymore to the databases.
I have a 40 clients-network, with 4 databases on 1 server. makes
around 150-160 open connections all the time, each taking about 5MByte
RAM in average.
I am connecting with my old application via ODBC until I rewrote the
application to using D7 and FIBPlus.
Any more ideas?
If not, i will try asking in another group. This situation already
lasts for 10 weeks but I don't experience any downside of any kind. It
only kinda makes me nervous... :)
ciao,
André