Subject Re: Dropping a field problem
Author deschenes_jacques
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Dmitry Yemanov"
<dimitr@u...> wrote:
> "deschenes_jacques" <deschenes_jacques@y...> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know what is that dependent_name 'DB$115'. Can anyone tell
> > me ?
>
> Search for a system generated domain RDB$115. You observe the result
of the
> known old bug causing invalid dependency entries to be stored (first
> character lost). This has been fixed in v1.5.
>
>
> Dmitry

I suspect a bug (first character lost) because there is no domain name
RDB$115 neither DB$115 in both RDB$RELATION_FIELDS and RDB$FIELDS.

As suggested, I suppose I could just delete the entries in the
RDB$DEPENDENCIES system table and drop the field.

Thanks!

Jacques