On 5/2/2005 at 4:17 AM Steve wrote:

> And RH ES has libstdc++.so.6 What is the best way to work around
> this? I tried ln -s libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.5 which brought a
> flurry of new problems. Suggestions please? I'm desperate.
>
>

Steve,

I solved this on Fedora Core 3 by rebuilding FB from the sources, which caused libstdc++.so.6 to be used instead of .5.

HTH,

Dan.