Chad Z. Hower wrote:

>:: We love Firebird. It has treated us well. We have larger
>:: clients with
>:: IT Departments that are requesting SQL Server because they
>:: have a few
>:: application built using SQL Server. We have kept them at
>
>Exactly - SQL clients WANT you to use SQL. They don't care what you have -
>they have a DB and they want EVERYTHING to run on it. Oracle customers too.
>
>:: change and now we are having to do it. I just wish that SQL Server
>:: supported Selectable Stored Procedures because our
>:: application is full of them.
>
>I don't have this problem. :)
>
>:: We want so much to be able to support both Firebird and SQL
>:: Server. We
>:: can't find a practical approach to doing this. We don't even mind
>
>We have one, in fact ours works on Oracle and others too. :)
>
>

I take it your solution is to remove all of the 'business' logic out of
the database (no stored procedures).

>:: keeping two versions of the database going and supporting both. The
>:: problem is the differences in the front end of our application. If
>:: anyone has any ideas, please let us know.
>
>That's the easy part. :)
>
>
>

So is this just a tease or are you willing to share your ideas?

Todd

>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>