Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Re: FB to SQL Server |
---|---|
Author | Chad Z. Hower |
Post date | 2005-04-20T15:02:53Z |
:: We love Firebird. It has treated us well. We have larger
:: clients with
:: IT Departments that are requesting SQL Server because they
:: have a few
:: application built using SQL Server. We have kept them at
Exactly - SQL clients WANT you to use SQL. They don't care what you have -
they have a DB and they want EVERYTHING to run on it. Oracle customers too.
:: change and now we are having to do it. I just wish that SQL Server
:: supported Selectable Stored Procedures because our
:: application is full of them.
I don't have this problem. :)
:: We want so much to be able to support both Firebird and SQL
:: Server. We
:: can't find a practical approach to doing this. We don't even mind
We have one, in fact ours works on Oracle and others too. :)
:: keeping two versions of the database going and supporting both. The
:: problem is the differences in the front end of our application. If
:: anyone has any ideas, please let us know.
That's the easy part. :)
:: clients with
:: IT Departments that are requesting SQL Server because they
:: have a few
:: application built using SQL Server. We have kept them at
Exactly - SQL clients WANT you to use SQL. They don't care what you have -
they have a DB and they want EVERYTHING to run on it. Oracle customers too.
:: change and now we are having to do it. I just wish that SQL Server
:: supported Selectable Stored Procedures because our
:: application is full of them.
I don't have this problem. :)
:: We want so much to be able to support both Firebird and SQL
:: Server. We
:: can't find a practical approach to doing this. We don't even mind
We have one, in fact ours works on Oracle and others too. :)
:: keeping two versions of the database going and supporting both. The
:: problem is the differences in the front end of our application. If
:: anyone has any ideas, please let us know.
That's the easy part. :)