Fabricio Araujo wrote:

> Internacionalization
> ====================
> If to attend you it will cost me anything that can
> affect end users, is not OK.

OK, I might agree, but the thing is that keeping the limitations we're
discussing here does cost *me* something. So, you're saying option B is
not ok because it costs you something compared to option A, but the fact
that option A costs someone else something compared to option B doesn't
matter. Excuse me, but that's selfish.

> If would cost nothing on
> performance, no code would break, I will continue with simple ASCII
> fields working like always, without increasing the
> network traffic (which FB is not very economic in it's
> wire protocol), or any of that things, so GO FOR IT.

Short term problems. In the long run, the problems you're suggesting
won't exist or will be so small compared to everything else that the
just don't matter, due to more powerful computers, higher bandwidths,
etc. In short: progress.

> Case sensitive identifiers
> ==========================
> *Forcing case* is not a good thing.

I just don't agree and I have repeatedly given imo strong arguments for
my position. I give up.

Kjell
--
--------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
Adressmarknaden AM AB
E-post: kjell.rilbe@...
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64