In article <001401c52dac$191af8b0$0a01a8c0@ANNIBALE>, Salvatore Besso wrote:

> > use it when you call the view
>
> thank you. I supposed this. Anyway the field against which I'm trying to use the
> parameter is not needed in the output list, but I think that there are no
> alternatives, right?

You rewrite it as a selectable stored procedure, that could take the parameter

--
Nick
-----We Solve your Computer Problems---
Founder & Listowner of the Prolifics User Group
Panther, Ingres, UNIX, Interbase, Firebird - Available Shortly