Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Events and SP2 |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Albuschat |
Post date | 2005-03-07T14:53:45Z |
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:22:38 -0000, Dixon Epperson
<dixonepperson@...> wrote:
a Firebird server itself running on the client. There's no problem with one
machine serving on - and connecting to - a port at the same time.
It's like a web-server that's serving on port 80: You can still access other
websites from this box without problems.
This way, you minimize firewall configuration to port 3050 and make
sure that if you can connect to a Firebird server, you can receive events, too.
More or less, at least. :)
...since you can distinguish between incoming and outgoing traffic in
your firewall.
regards,
Daniel Albuschat
--
eat(this); // delicious suicide
<dixonepperson@...> wrote:
>Basically, there should be no problem with this, as long as you don't have
> Is there problem if I put it as the same port as the database, ie
> 3050? That is what the new interbase does, and I'm not real sure I
> want to do that. Just wanted to know.
a Firebird server itself running on the client. There's no problem with one
machine serving on - and connecting to - a port at the same time.
It's like a web-server that's serving on port 80: You can still access other
websites from this box without problems.
This way, you minimize firewall configuration to port 3050 and make
sure that if you can connect to a Firebird server, you can receive events, too.
More or less, at least. :)
...since you can distinguish between incoming and outgoing traffic in
your firewall.
regards,
Daniel Albuschat
--
eat(this); // delicious suicide