Subject | RE: [firebird-support] using multiple databases |
---|---|
Author | Fabricio Araujo |
Post date | 2005-02-27T03:34:33Z |
Not when the system is already composed of 6 different
applications - this including the simulation engine, the
visual interface app, the data management app, the
command dispatcher, and conflict calculation app.
All of then communicating almost only by the DB.
A 3-tier would make the persistence of all these
apps to be severely rewritten, Alan. Not acceptable
by any means.
What I want to a later advocacy of FB adoption is a
DB-only migration. Rewrite the SPs and nothing more,
which would cost a entire month or even two of heavy work
OF ME and maybe more one. Believe me, is much
faster to achieve than make the boss buy the idea of
creating a 3-tier module.
applications - this including the simulation engine, the
visual interface app, the data management app, the
command dispatcher, and conflict calculation app.
All of then communicating almost only by the DB.
A 3-tier would make the persistence of all these
apps to be severely rewritten, Alan. Not acceptable
by any means.
What I want to a later advocacy of FB adoption is a
DB-only migration. Rewrite the SPs and nothing more,
which would cost a entire month or even two of heavy work
OF ME and maybe more one. Believe me, is much
faster to achieve than make the boss buy the idea of
creating a 3-tier module.
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:38:09 +1100, Alan McDonald wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:26:54 +1100, Alan McDonald wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> Insanity. And will broke the requisite of having a
>> >> simulation per database, and just one enciclopedic
>> >> database. So the customer will not be happy at all.
>> >>
>> >> It's a requisite that MSSQL can cope. If a FIrebird
>> >> implementation have a chance to happen, it's only
>> >> after having the server side multi-db queries implemented.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:31:07 +1100, Alan McDonald wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This is really my #1 on the wishlist....
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:18:38 +1100, Helen Borrie wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >all you need to do is get over this need to have separate DBs (often a
>> >> >leftover habit of desktop database environments) - just
>> >> normalise your data
>> >> >and put it all together... if they're on the same machine they
>> >> should be in
>> >> >the same file....
>> >> >Alan
>> >
>> >yes - there are real constraints to the idea of one monolithic database.
>> >There are also people who are not famliar with the benefits either.
>>
>> For OUR system is absolute insanity go to Firebird now (or before
>> a FB version have server side multi-db queries). We gained A LOT
>> with that design in terms of maintenance and ease of use.
>
>all you need is a 3 tier interface and you can have server side multi-db
>queries
>Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>