Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Config for mostly-readonly DB? |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2005-02-21T22:49:13Z |
Kjell Rilbe wrote:
guessed that would explode in the compiler.
serialized. The advantage of classic is a bit more parallelism and, in
the case of local inserts, a much shorter code path. I've been looking
at a problem that involves very high insert rates over short periods of
time, so I have code path length on the brain.
Ann
>No doubt, Firebird or more likely Arno... 850 criteria - I would have
> :-) You should have more faith in Firebird!
guessed that would explode in the compiler.
>>I hadn't got to the bit where you mentioned that everything was
>>I'd be tempted to look at classic
>
> It seems to be runnig nicely on super server. Why classic?
serialized. The advantage of classic is a bit more parallelism and, in
the case of local inserts, a much shorter code path. I've been looking
at a problem that involves very high insert rates over short periods of
time, so I have code path length on the brain.
>Cheers,
Ann