Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird3 and Multi Processors |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2005-12-01T02:58:49Z |
At 12:02 AM 1/12/2005 +0000, you wrote:
English speakers) believing that "experimental" means "unstable". When Fb
1.5 was released, Classic was stable. If it were not, it wouldn't have
been in a release.
However, with nothing useful from field-testers regarding its performance,
etc. on Windows, with real-life loads, it was released marked
"experimental". Two years and three sub-releases later, with lots of high
volume deployments, it's probably even past "experimental" now. :-))
./heLen
>--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Ann W. Harrison"Au contraire, it appears to have more to do with people (notably, native
><aharrison@i...> wrote:
> >
> > robertgilland wrote:
> > >
> > > But I heard Classic was not stable in windows environment.
> > > Is there any major dramas in uninstalling superserver in windows
> > > and installing classic in windows?
>
>I think the confusion here is that the old Superserver vs Classic
>document listed Classic as experimental on Windows. From my
>understanding, it is no longer considered experimental.
English speakers) believing that "experimental" means "unstable". When Fb
1.5 was released, Classic was stable. If it were not, it wouldn't have
been in a release.
However, with nothing useful from field-testers regarding its performance,
etc. on Windows, with real-life loads, it was released marked
"experimental". Two years and three sub-releases later, with lots of high
volume deployments, it's probably even past "experimental" now. :-))
./heLen