Subject | Re: result set not updated immediately after post |
---|---|
Author | Zach Saw |
Post date | 2005-10-26T05:22:36Z |
Hi Olivier,
I've tried ilReadDirty -- it's still the same. So I think it's most
probably a client API thing.
Any thoughts on whether this should be expected? I know for JET (MS
Access DB), this is expect as it is by design -- they have an out of
order execution engine... -- even in the same thread...
Thanks,
Zach
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Zach Saw" <zachs78@y...>
wrote:
I've tried ilReadDirty -- it's still the same. So I think it's most
probably a client API thing.
Any thoughts on whether this should be expected? I know for JET (MS
Access DB), this is expect as it is by design -- they have an out of
order execution engine... -- even in the same thread...
Thanks,
Zach
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Zach Saw" <zachs78@y...>
wrote:
>again
>
> > Could you re-run your test using IBPP::ilReadDirty and report
> > (which is read_committed with rec_version while ilReadCommittedis
> > read_committed with NO_rec_version) ?
> >
> > (I doubt this is IBPP related. If it turns to be, we'll move the
> > thread to the list where it belongs.)
> >
>