Subject | Re: Does Firebird need "compact" process |
---|---|
Author | itcmanggadua |
Post date | 2004-08-05T01:23:01Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Aage Johansen <aagjohan@o...>
wrote:
it said "Interbase" as oppose to "Firebird". I suggest "only limited
by operating system" wording so a newbie will not misunderstand and
therefore will not prefer other db.
Thanks for all the answers.
Conclusion: There is no hassle for "compact"-ing database. So I can
use Firebird and doing online backup, and as long as I do not need to
restore (which I may not need frequently) Firebird can always fly.
There is no limitation on database size.
Great,
Cheers,
Ogud
wrote:
> Svein Erling Tysvær wrote:platforms" ???
>
> > Read this:
> > http://firebird.sourceforge.net/index.php?op=guide&id=ib6_techspec
>
>
> "Maximum size of one file: 4GB on most platforms; 2GB on some
>It seems so. I read about the limitation from that page also, although
> Isn't this page in need of a revision?
>
>
>
> --
> Aage J.
it said "Interbase" as oppose to "Firebird". I suggest "only limited
by operating system" wording so a newbie will not misunderstand and
therefore will not prefer other db.
Thanks for all the answers.
Conclusion: There is no hassle for "compact"-ing database. So I can
use Firebird and doing online backup, and as long as I do not need to
restore (which I may not need frequently) Firebird can always fly.
There is no limitation on database size.
Great,
Cheers,
Ogud