Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Down time |
---|---|
Author | Alexandre Benson Smith |
Post date | 2004-08-02T20:57:17Z |
Mike Harbison wrote:
Could you elaborate on this ?
What kind of cluster do you have ?
Are you doing load balancing ? ou just fail over ?
How do diferent server access the same db ?
I have read that CS *could* be used (after some transformation, don't
know of wich kind) be used on clusters, but I thought it was experimental...
Can someone shed a light on this ???
see you !
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br
>Just to share my three-cents we have been running Interbase now FirebirdHi Mike,
>for years on a Microsoft Cluster and have NO PROBLEMS with it. I have to
>say it's flawless with fail over from node to node and you can't ask for
>more. I am also in the process of setting up a SQL cluster and that is
>a nightmare compared to Firebird.
>Firebird works very well for large Enterprises as my databases are in
>excess of 10 Gigs. We also replicate all our databases offsite to four
>different hosting companies. Firebird has yet to let me down. The only
>down time I have had is my hosting companies.
>
>Mike.
>
>
Could you elaborate on this ?
What kind of cluster do you have ?
Are you doing load balancing ? ou just fail over ?
How do diferent server access the same db ?
I have read that CS *could* be used (after some transformation, don't
know of wich kind) be used on clusters, but I thought it was experimental...
Can someone shed a light on this ???
see you !
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br