> Not actually, since the maximum number of rows in a table is an integer,
> not a BigInt. That is, you couldn't have a table that had one value for
> every possible BigInt whereas (at least in theory) it would be
> possible to
> have one row for every possible 32-bit integer.
>
> /hb
>

hep - forgot we're in holding mode there... not much good having bigints and
only being able to put int number of rows in a table. maybe version 2
Alan