Subject | Re: [firebird-support] fbclient.dll - synchronous or asynchronous? |
---|---|
Author | Jonathan Neve |
Post date | 2004-07-09T12:05:21Z |
Martijn Tonies wrote:
database connections to the same database, one per thread. Then, I would
like to have a "cross-database transaction" across all the threads. Is
this not possible?
Thanks!
Jonathan Neve.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>OTOH, is it possible for all these different DB connections to shareI'm not talking about having multiple databases, but rather, multiple
>>>>>
>>>>>
>the
>
>
>>>>>same transaction across all the threads?
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>Jonathan Neve.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>NO
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>You can, however, create a cross-database transaction using
>>>two-phase commit :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>That sounds very much like what I was proposing... What's the difference?
>>
>>
>
>A cross database transaction is started for each database, not simply
>shared between database.
>
>
database connections to the same database, one per thread. Then, I would
like to have a "cross-database transaction" across all the threads. Is
this not possible?
Thanks!
Jonathan Neve.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]