Subject | Re: [firebird-support] rsync - differential backup |
---|---|
Author | Jaume Sabater |
Post date | 2004-06-18T09:41:07Z |
m2data wrote:
have no problem. How efficient it will be is just another thing (not as
much as it could be, as you stated in your email).
I am using rsync on Linux boxes and never had any trouble. Nevertheless,
I bzip2 the gbak file before rsyncing, as it reduces its size more than
ten times (yes, I know that then rsync becomes just a "copy" tool, but
it's fast anyway).
Rsyncing Oracle databases is also a bad idea. In general terms, rsyncing
databases is quite unuseful (and dangerous some times).
--
Jaume Sabater
http://linuxsilo.net
"Ubi sapientas ibi libertas"
> Is there anyone with experience using rsync on windows?As far as the file is not being used by the database server, you will
>
> I would like to transfer our backupfile (gbak) to a remote location.
> The database size is >2G and it is mostly inserts and (almost) never
> deletes. The database countains alot of medical JPG/PNG images and for
> security reasons I cannot store the imagefiles external.
have no problem. How efficient it will be is just another thing (not as
much as it could be, as you stated in your email).
I am using rsync on Linux boxes and never had any trouble. Nevertheless,
I bzip2 the gbak file before rsyncing, as it reduces its size more than
ten times (yes, I know that then rsync becomes just a "copy" tool, but
it's fast anyway).
Rsyncing Oracle databases is also a bad idea. In general terms, rsyncing
databases is quite unuseful (and dangerous some times).
--
Jaume Sabater
http://linuxsilo.net
"Ubi sapientas ibi libertas"