Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Evaluating FB 1.5 questions |
---|---|
Author | Dimitry Sibiryakov |
Post date | 2004-06-17T06:39:36Z |
On 16 Jun 2004 at 14:32, rfsoft wrote:
Your application must not use SYSDBA account. This accout for local
DBA only. If your application needs perform some DBA work, ask the
real DBA for his/her password. Or ask DBA to do the work.
If customer organization don't have permanent administrator, there
must be a visiting one.
If you make "null" configuration application for idiots, only
idiots will be able to use it. If an application conflicts with an
administrator, guess what will happened? Probably, they fire
administrator, but I'd bet the admin'll uninstall the application.
Guy, there is a lot of interesting things in this life. And many
suitable occupations. Why you chose programming?..
described in release notes.
SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.
>I'm just evaluating FB 1.5 and FIBPlus for an upcoming product I mustI'd say that problems are in your application architecture...
>develop. Now I see three very serious problem with this combination,
>which makes it unusable if it isn't solvable. Here they are:
>1. FB uses a central user security database. I think I will get much[with a gesture in Jedi-style]
>of problems if my application gets installed on a system where FB
>already is installed and configured for anyone elses applications.
>That meens it has overriden the SYSDBA password and as such my
>application will not be able to add or modify any user rights for my
>aplications need.
Your application must not use SYSDBA account. This accout for local
DBA only. If your application needs perform some DBA work, ask the
real DBA for his/her password. Or ask DBA to do the work.
> My application should be a "null" configurationEvery application which requires DBMS server, requires DBA. Point.
>solution, where the users don't should do anything on the DB server
>configuration. They are normal "idiotic" users who have no idea of DB
>servers. How is this problem handled by others of you?
If customer organization don't have permanent administrator, there
must be a visiting one.
If you make "null" configuration application for idiots, only
idiots will be able to use it. If an application conflicts with an
administrator, guess what will happened? Probably, they fire
administrator, but I'd bet the admin'll uninstall the application.
>2. For security reasons I want to install the FB server on aForget it. Idiotic users and security are incompatible.
>diffrent port than the standard 3050.
> Does someone know how I can setup a second FB instance which runsIf you can't read release notes, nothing and nobody can help you.
>on a different port, if on the target system already a FB server is
>installed? With 1.5 it should somehow be possible to run two
>instances of FB but I didn't find anything about how this can be
>done exactly.
Guy, there is a lot of interesting things in this life. And many
suitable occupations. Why you chose programming?..
>3. Does FB 1.5 have any problems with an already installed InterbaseNo problems. It is installable and installation process is
>Server? So is it installable on such a system at all?
described in release notes.
SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.