So you don't see a problem with the behaviour of check constraints at
the moment?

--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Ivan Prenosil"
<Ivan.Prenosil@s...> wrote:

> > I am only suggesting dirty-read be used for check constraints
> thus I expect you should supply its definition.
> I simply showed that neither of the only two definitions I can

imagine (read last

> version/read all versions) will not solve anything, just add more

problems.

>
> Even if you add such feature, the next day you will suggest that
> "Check constraints should work in a way consistent with application.
> Why my application can't restrict data the same way as check

constraint ?

> Let's make dirty-read transactions the default" :-)