Subject | Re: Checking periods don't overlap |
---|---|
Author | johnsparrowuk |
Post date | 2004-06-14T13:32:45Z |
Well, it's a option in SQL Server 2005 (turned off by default!). For
use when 'update conflicts are rare' according to the blurb.
Maintained by using a linked list in tempdb (ewwwwww!).
I'm prepared to accept FB is the coolest db ever! but...
Just tell me how I can solve my period-overlap problem???!?!?! :0
John
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Martijn Tonies"
<m.tonies@u...> wrote:
use when 'update conflicts are rare' according to the blurb.
Maintained by using a linked list in tempdb (ewwwwww!).
I'm prepared to accept FB is the coolest db ever! but...
Just tell me how I can solve my period-overlap problem???!?!?! :0
John
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Martijn Tonies"
<m.tonies@u...> wrote:
> Ehm... on the other hand... MS SQL is going to implement this in
> Yukon (SQL Server 9). And PostgreSQL has it, so does Oracle,
> Netfrastructure, Nexus ( I believe ), ThinkSQL, InnoDB (MySQL)
> and more...
>
> Guess it's gotta be good for something :-D
>