On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 03:34:40 +0000 (UTC), Lester Caine wrote:

> Christian Gütter wrote:
>
>>> I don't believe W98 will use any more than 64Mb, that was oodles when
>>> it was released, or perhaps it's just that only the first 64Mb is
>>> managed - I forget which :)
>>
>> this is not true. Windows 98 can use 256 MB of RAM.
>> It can also be run with more RAM, but it would only
>> use 256 MB.
>
> OK I stand corrected - it's above 512Mb it will not boot with :)
> You don't get much speed improvement over 64Mb, unlike W2k
> ( Now what was the limit for Win3.1 ;) )
>


Don't remember the limit, but most computers had 1MB.
Some had perversely high-end machines with 2MB - it rocked. Well, sort of.


--
Aage J.