Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Database on network drive? |
---|---|
Author | Tom Munro Glass |
Post date | 2004-04-01T20:34:35Z |
Thanks to all who responded. I thought this was probably the situation, but
when customers ask for something like this, it's good to have the facts at
hand when you tell them NO!
Tom
when customers ask for something like this, it's good to have the facts at
hand when you tell them NO!
Tom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Helen Borrie [mailto:helebor@...]
> Sent: Friday, 2 April 2004 00:57
> To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Database on network drive?
>
>
> At 02:42 PM 1/04/2004 +0200, you wrote:
>
>
> >Tom Munro Glass schrieb:
> >
> > > Will FB, either the full server or the embedded server, work with a
> > database
> > > file located on a fileserver? The file could either be
> accessible via a
> > > mapped network drive or a UNC address.
> >
> >If really required it should be an simple modification in jrd.cpp.
> >Just remove the checks for network drives (ISC_check_if_remote) and
> >recompile the server.
> >
> >Beware: Firebird might damage databases opened from several machines!
> >Super-Server should prevent this by exclusively locking the file -
> >this should block other machines from accessing it.
>
> Erm, don't try this on any database you love. It's not a question of
> removing the checks for network drives. The Firebird server manages its
> own diskspace. To do so, it has to request its host OS for space to
> allocate. If you're really keen to break a database, don't go to the
> trouble of hacking the code. There's a configuration setting in
> firebird.conf put there for the benefit of those who like cheap thrills.
>
> /hb
>
>
>
> >Elmar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>