Subject | Re: seems bug : Field accepts NULL Values (empty string) even if it is defined w |
---|---|
Author | Alexander V.Nevsky |
Post date | 2004-03-16T15:16:34Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Svein Erling"
<svein.erling.tysvaer@k...> wrote:
AFAIK, in FB internally null "values" are stored as 0-representation
accordingly to data type and nullness :) is pointed by separate flag too.
Best regards,
Alexander.
<svein.erling.tysvaer@k...> wrote:
> > And add to the confusion that in Dutch, the word for zero (0)Nol (with L softened, AFAIK you have'nt such a sound) in Russian.
> > is pronounced as "null" (but written like "nul"). :-)
>
> Well, in Norwegian we do spell it null. Though I don't think we should
> blame any SQL guy for not knowing all the languages of the world.
AFAIK, in FB internally null "values" are stored as 0-representation
accordingly to data type and nullness :) is pointed by separate flag too.
Best regards,
Alexander.