Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: seems bug : Field accepts NULL Values (empty string) even if it is defined w |
---|---|
Author | Jonathan Neve |
Post date | 2004-03-16T11:08:25Z |
Alexander V.Nevsky wrote:
forever be a nuisance for every database developer! :-)
Jonathan Neve.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Neve <jonathan@m...>Absolutely! A bug in that it defines a useless distinction that would
>wrote:
>
>
>>Martijn Tonies wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>You're answering your own question: '' (empty string) is NOT NULL.
>>>NULL is NULL (empty). An empty string is a value. NULL is a state,
>>>so is "NOT NULL".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>IMHO, this unique feature could nearly be considered a bug...
>>
>>
>
> In SQL standard? ;)
>
>
forever be a nuisance for every database developer! :-)
Jonathan Neve.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]