Subject | Re: [firebird-support] FB 1.5 - Which Linux Distro |
---|---|
Author | Jakub Hegenbart |
Post date | 2004-02-25T17:12:23Z |
> Lou wrote:There isn't much to confiuge and maintain, I'd say. An if reinstalling, simply "tar cfz /root/configbackup.tar.gz /etc". Or make a script for making the changes, it's easy. Slack would be better for a server...well, my opinion may be biased by the fact that don't use any other system on my HW, so personally, for me, it's better on desktop, too :) but you definitely will appreciate only 10 megs of used memory after booting Slack+Firebird :) (which is what I have with Apache+Firebird, until I start X)
> > I have a new Dell server that is to be a Firebird 1.5 server. I am
> > looking for advice on the best Linux Distro to utilize as well as
> > server model (SS or CS)? It is replacing a Win2K FB1.03 SS machine.
>
> The best distro is the one you're most familiar with. :)
>
> I have Firebird installed on Mandrake 9.0 (both SS and CS) and on
> Slackware 9.1. They work great everywhere. Prehaps even better on Slack
> since it requires less resources for OS, so more is left to the
> Firebird. OTOH, Mandrake is easier to configure and maintain.
Jakub Hegenbart
P.S.: And yes, the one you're familiar with IS the best. Firebird isn't that demanding :) (but of course, if you're hunting for performance, compile Gentoo and optimize for your HW, and use RAID, if available...)
____________________________________________________________
Chcete dostávat Váš oblíbený časopis TÝDEN každé pondělí? Před osmou hodinou ráno? A navíc získat skvělé CD dle Vašeho výběru? Neváhejte a předplaťte si TÝDEN již nyní! http://ad2.seznam.cz/redir.cgi?instance=70450%26url=http://www.tyden.cz/predplatne/main.html