Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird is slow at the first connection |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2004-12-27T12:52:50Z |
At 06:37 AM 27/12/2004 -0500, you wrote:
cards, firewall, etc.) I have a mix of servers on the LAN here. The
Windows ones are Win2000, the Linux ones are RedHat 8 and Mandrake 9.1
respectively. All machines are single CPU, ranging from 1.3 GHz AMD down
to Intel ~450 MHz. All of the hard disks except one are 5400 IDE (though I
don't recommend slow disks!!) Mea culpa, I don't think I've ever defragged
any of them. I don't get connection delays with any of them on the first
connection, either as servers or clients.
I use TCP/IP for all Firebird connections and I additionally have an Apache
server running on the daggiest server of them all.
I use strictly static host name setups for all machines - hostname mapped
directly to the IP address that the NIC is broadcasting from its setup,
subnetmask configured to 255.255.255.0 in all cases.
I'm also ultra-pertickler about ensuring the clients are using the right
client library.
Have you studied the Quick Start Guide?
operations.
Are you using some third-party tool for these connections? Do you have the
same delays when using isql?
opens the server exclusively locks the file. SR sneaks in when this
fileopen request occurs and image-copies the file, meaning the server has
to wait until it can get its exclusive lock.
./hb
>Same here. This is a really irritationg issue. I have tried EVERY fixWell, you have to suspect the way your systems are configured (network
>found on the lists/archives/google to no avail. The problem occurs under
>Win2000 and XP. This is regardless of connection type. Even connecting
>remote to a linux server (dual opteron 2G+ RAM) the windows side takes
>FOREVER. Doing it locally also makes no difference. This is on machines
>with 2.2G+ processors (both intel and AMD), 1G+ RAM, 250G+ Storage.
cards, firewall, etc.) I have a mix of servers on the LAN here. The
Windows ones are Win2000, the Linux ones are RedHat 8 and Mandrake 9.1
respectively. All machines are single CPU, ranging from 1.3 GHz AMD down
to Intel ~450 MHz. All of the hard disks except one are 5400 IDE (though I
don't recommend slow disks!!) Mea culpa, I don't think I've ever defragged
any of them. I don't get connection delays with any of them on the first
connection, either as servers or clients.
I use TCP/IP for all Firebird connections and I additionally have an Apache
server running on the daggiest server of them all.
I use strictly static host name setups for all machines - hostname mapped
directly to the IP address that the NIC is broadcasting from its setup,
subnetmask configured to 255.255.255.0 in all cases.
I'm also ultra-pertickler about ensuring the clients are using the right
client library.
Have you studied the Quick Start Guide?
>I even tried using a RAID locally with 2000 server to no avail. I'veNope. The engine loads index pages into the cache as and when required for
>tried multiprocessors, Gigabit Networking... you name it, I've tried it.
>
>It seems like it's loading indices but I can't seem to track it down.
operations.
Are you using some third-party tool for these connections? Do you have the
same delays when using isql?
> > I have the same thing.You have to suspect SystemRestore here for XP. When the first connection
> >
> > The first connection is slow for me on my pentium with the IDE disk
> > (WindowsXP/Superserver). When I try to connect the hard disk works
> > constantly about 2 minutes and then the first connection is
> > established.
opens the server exclusively locks the file. SR sneaks in when this
fileopen request occurs and image-copies the file, meaning the server has
to wait until it can get its exclusive lock.
./hb