Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Temporary tables |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2004-12-17T23:34:30Z |
Hi,
At December 17, 2004, 15:50, Garrett Smith wrote:
tables has been talked about lately, but no consensus on how to
implement them has really been reached, because there are a few models
to choose from on how to implement them and the SQL standard does
differ to MS-SQL temp tables.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)
At December 17, 2004, 15:50, Garrett Smith wrote:
> Storage Box wrote:Subqueries will be available in FB 2.0. And, the requirement for temp
>> Also, sometimes it's better to query more than once to get
>> values+sub-values than it is to make a single monster of a
>> joined/union query.
> This is the design approach I'm taking (and have taken with other
> dbmses), but lack of temp tables and/or subqueries is making it
> difficult.
tables has been talked about lately, but no consensus on how to
implement them has really been reached, because there are a few models
to choose from on how to implement them and the SQL standard does
differ to MS-SQL temp tables.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)