Hi Alan,

No... but that is only anecdotal evidence... haven't done any serious
performance testing yet. Do you mean in query performance or program
loading type issues? We certainly don't notice it in program loading...
having said that, I've never been completely clear on how Windows loads
dlls, and whether everything is loaded all at once etc.

Our application has database access just about everywhere, but select
result sets are generally very small... at least for 99% of users, so
given the deployment flexibility, we'd probably just take a performance
hit if it exists, or try to rework some SQL.

Regards,

Peter Lee

Alan McDonald wrote:

>>Hi Alan,
>>
>>This is what we understand to be the case... and we're doing that now
>>(in beta :-) ) with no problems.
>>
>>So, for a single computer install, we just deploy fbembed.dll (and
>>associated files)... on a 'server' machine, we do a full fb server
>>install, with the real client.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Peter Lee
>>
>>
>
>Peter,
>Have your tests so far revealed any performance difference using a 1.4Mb
>client compared with a 340Kb client?
>Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Peter Lee Mobile: +61 412 011 174 ptle@...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rising Software Australia Pty. Ltd. http://www.risingsoftware.com/
Publishers of 'Auralia' - Ear Training and 'Musition' - Theory Training
Ph: +61 3 9894 4788 FAX: +61 3 9894 3362 USA Freecall: 1 888 667 7839