Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Memory Usage when accessing larger tables |
---|---|
Author | Bogusław Brandys |
Post date | 2004-11-29T13:37:40Z |
williamvdw2004 wrote:
Regards
Boguslaw
>Why CommitRetain instead of just Commit (hard) ?
> --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...>
> wrote:
>
>>At 05:45 PM 29/11/2004 +1100, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>I have made this post before but did not get any response. Can
>>>>someone at least tell me if this is normal. All help will be
>>>>appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>I have a database (FB 1.5) with about 300 000 records in one
>>>>table, I am using IBO for connectivity. The problem is that
>
> when I do
>
>>>>a query (on the big table) whether there is data returned or
>
> not +/-
>
>>>>250 megs of ram gets used. The ram is only freed once I
>
> disconnect
>
>>>>from the database.
>>>>
>>>>What can I do to make the memory usage less?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>William
>>>
>>>do you limit the query by use of a WHERE clause at all? or are you
>
> just
>
>>>pulling up all 300000 records?
>>
>>Additionally, do you ever commit the select statement during the
>
> course of
>
>>the user's session?
>>
>>./hb
>
>
> Hi yes I limit the select satment with a where clause a status
> flield. This select returns minimal rows 1 or 2 the most I have seen
> is 5 rows (out of 300 000). Yes I do a commit -
> IB_Transaction.CommitRetaining
>
> This select is not critical to the working of my program and I have
> commented it out, then the next select statemnt takes the 250 mb of
> ram. This statemment is as follows.
>
> 'SELECT MAX(TIMESENT) AS LASTREC from ' + TableName
>
> I also do a commitRetaining after this statment. (have used this code
> in test app with the same results)
>
> Thanks
> William
>
Regards
Boguslaw