Hi,

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:21:07 +1100, Helen Borrie <helebor@...>
wrote:

> At 11:49 AM 28/11/2004 +0200, you wrote:
>
> It's assumed that it always does detect it - monitoring attachments is
> part
> of what the server does. It will continue listening for a response from a
> connection for a set timeout period (the length of which depends on the
> NOS
> configuration), after which it assumes the connection is dead and
> proceeds
> to deal with unfinished transactions from that connection - rolling them
> back or flagging them as limbo, according to whether the transactions
> were
> related to just that connection or involved other connections,
> respectively.
>
> Presumably (and Ann or Pavel can confirm, correct or expand here) the
> server won't be in a position to "detect" anything if it crashes
> itself. Any unresolved transactions would just disappear in that case,
> since all connections would just die and the transaction state bitmap
> would
> be gone.
>
> ./heLen
>

Thanks for explanation :) , just last small question: what is 'NOS'?

--
Miroslav Penchev