Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird embedded scalabilty and SS server stop doubts |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2004-11-27T20:17:50Z |
At 02:39 PM 11/27/2004, kartinku wrote:
every record. The more records, the more reads. This topic has
been discussed (ad nauseum) on this list. If you seriously need
to keep a count of records, several alternatives have been described
which reduce the cost.
a hardware assist. You can split a firebird database into separate
files but you can not direct the storage of records to files.
Regards,
Ann
>My database size has grown to 1.28GB .Yes. Linearly. Counting the records in a table requires reading
>
>Is 'count(*) query performance' goes down when record count increases?
every record. The more records, the more reads. This topic has
been discussed (ad nauseum) on this list. If you seriously need
to keep a count of records, several alternatives have been described
which reduce the cost.
>Since firebird maintains the data in single won't it degrade dbIf you want to get parallelism in disk access, you might consider
>performance.
a hardware assist. You can split a firebird database into separate
files but you can not direct the storage of records to files.
Regards,
Ann