Subject | AW: [firebird-support] Linux Performance 1.5.1 |
---|---|
Author | Steffen Heil |
Post date | 2004-11-26T08:11:05Z |
Hi
far as I know.
Right.
No. Not AFAIK.
classic is *required* to use SMP systems.
Each client gets its own server process and those can be bound to one
processor.
However, more threads require more memory and so the client connection count
is much more limited than the connection count with superserver, which uses
one process only and at least one thread per client and therefor can share
memory...
Regards,
Steffen
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> I think you need a lot more RAM to run Classic effectively. Classic hasnever been touted as the final thing for Windows, it's more a Linux build as
far as I know.
Right.
> But classic I think is supposed to cater for greater concurrent users thatsuperserver.
No. Not AFAIK.
classic is *required* to use SMP systems.
Each client gets its own server process and those can be bound to one
processor.
However, more threads require more memory and so the client connection count
is much more limited than the connection count with superserver, which uses
one process only and at least one thread per client and therefor can share
memory...
Regards,
Steffen
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]