| Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: SELECT COUNT(sub_select.*) as COUNT, sub_select.user_name ... |
|---|---|
| Author | Helen Borrie |
| Post date | 2004-01-15T12:11:14Z |
At 11:57 AM 15/01/2004 +0000, you wrote:
Out of curiosity, why do you need a set that has the full set count in
every row?
/hb
> > SELECT..lower performance than what?
> > (select count(ss.user_name) from USER ss) as "COUNT",
> > u.user_name,
> > u.password
> > FROM USER u;
> >
> > /hb
>
>it method is lower performance
Out of curiosity, why do you need a set that has the full set count in
every row?
/hb