Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Size influencing speed |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2004-01-12T11:57:20Z |
Hi,
At January 12, 2004, 06:58, Alan McDonald wrote:
tables in FB 1.0.3 don't have indices. FB 1.5 now have indices and
the performance is faster when preparing a DML statement. With 3200
tables, the performance gain will be noticeable in FB 1.5 compared to
FB 1.0.3.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)
At January 12, 2004, 06:58, Alan McDonald wrote:
>> It depends..... I 've a db with a *lot* of table ( about 3200 ) andI think it might be related to the metadata on the server. The system
>> firebird is slower compared with an other db with less table ( 200 tables)
>> Same query, same data.
>>
>> Firebird 1.03
>> Windows 2000 Professional
>> Page buffers = 8192
> I would have to wonder whether, with 3200 tables, you are experiencing a
> connection/schema load pause, rather than a select from the small table
> slowness??
tables in FB 1.0.3 don't have indices. FB 1.5 now have indices and
the performance is faster when preparing a DML statement. With 3200
tables, the performance gain will be noticeable in FB 1.5 compared to
FB 1.0.3.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)