Hi,

At September 10, 2003, 13:29, Artur Anjos wrote:

> If not mistaken, I think that a commit will give you less overhead that a
> rollback.

> But this is just a feeling. :-)

I think you're wright. I was just thinking about it. If not mistaken,
rollbacked transactions have to be changed to committed for the OIT
and OAT advances. And, that can only be done with a sweep. I found
this knowledge base article on IBPhoenix, describing this:
http://www.ibphoenix.com/main.nfs?a=ibphoenix&l=;IBPHOENIX.KNOWLEDGEBASE;ID='128'

--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)