>
>Unfortunately, the first query uses fake identifiers, so it's impossible to
>tell how you are getting BATCHNO into the RECON table. Thus I can't give
>you any meaningful sample.
>
>Wouldn't it would reduce confusion to start the whole question over?
>
>heLen

No, it's cool - I thought about it and then did it with an SP FOR ...
SELECT ... INTO.

Worked well, albeit a bit slowly.

Thanks

Tim


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]