Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Linux versions supported? |
---|---|
Author | Doug Chamberlin |
Post date | 2003-07-14T17:41:26Z |
At 7/14/2003 11:30 AM (Monday), Phil Shrimpton wrote:
hope this all settles down significantly before 1.5 approaches release. I
intend to start with 1.03 in any case.
rather closely. I'd hate to try something on one and then turn to the other
and have it just not work - or worse yet work in a different way.
then rebuild it all from scratch. I guess Debian is the best distro for
that. But what has me nervous are the reports illustrating how fragile the
build scripts are. maybe I've been lurking on the FB-devel list too much
and I'm just spooked. Time will tell.
I don't envy Helen in attempting to chart out the various incompatibilities
for her book, though.
with Windows for long enough and not hated it too much.
as my main platform and see where it leads me. I've done test installs of
half a dozen Linux distros and watched the user friendliness of the choices
improve over the last few years. However, I've not spent much total time
with Linux compared to Windows.
> > I guess I picked the wrong time to start looking into Linux + Firebird +It is the relatively new FB 1.5 install issues that had me concerned. I
> > Kylix. Or, perhaps there will never be a good time!
>
>Taking Kylix out of the picture for the moment, Linux and Firebird has always
>been an excellent combination, as easy to install as on Windows, better
>performance, better stability etc. Until the FB1.5 RC's I never had any
>problems installing FB on any distro.
hope this all settles down significantly before 1.5 approaches release. I
intend to start with 1.03 in any case.
>Kylix is a different issue, but is only really a problem IMO for theIdeally, of course, I'd like my development machine to match my server
>'development machine', you should be able to deploy to a wider range of
>distos.
rather closely. I'd hate to try something on one and then turn to the other
and have it just not work - or worse yet work in a different way.
> > This is a dismal situation, exacerbated by the fact that when it comes toPart of me yearns for a source-only starting point where I install once,
> > Linux I am a lowly user and do NOT want to get involved with
> > recompiling/linking applications in order to use them.
>
>I have rarely if ever had to do this, and when I have, the 'compile' has been
>part of the installation process.
then rebuild it all from scratch. I guess Debian is the best distro for
that. But what has me nervous are the reports illustrating how fragile the
build scripts are. maybe I've been lurking on the FB-devel list too much
and I'm just spooked. Time will tell.
I don't envy Helen in attempting to chart out the various incompatibilities
for her book, though.
> > Mostly, I'm concerned about the upcoming Linux 2.6 release and what willIf that is all it ends up being then I can adapt. After all, I've lived
> > work with it.
>
>The kernel should not be an issue, its the 'C' library that causes the grief
>(bit like the comctrls issue on Windows).
with Windows for long enough and not hated it too much.
> > Let's stay on top of this issue, folks. Anyone having any news or successI don't have anything in particular in mind. Just want to move off Windows
> > with specific combinations of software, please share it right away!
>
>What type of application are you looking to develop? (server, GUI, etc.)
>There are other tools/languages that work well with FB, that might be an
>alternative to Kylix)
as my main platform and see where it leads me. I've done test installs of
half a dozen Linux distros and watched the user friendliness of the choices
improve over the last few years. However, I've not spent much total time
with Linux compared to Windows.