At 12:23 10.07.2003 -0400, you wrote:

>While I think 200 is a little over kill, anything above 50 is fine by me
>-- that way we have more room before needing to change the ODS to an
>int.

Don't we also want to ascertain that we stay clear of the ODS numbers for
Yaffil? I don't know whether they've changed the ODS or not (and if so, to
what number), but expect an ODS clash to be troublesome for those
experiencing it regardless of which of the databases are involved.

Set