Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re[2]: OT: Survey about database corruption (for portuguese speakers only) |
---|---|
Author | Yang Jin |
Post date | 2003-07-10T11:38:41Z |
Helen Borrie <helebor@...> wrote:
At 12:50 PM 10/07/2003 +0800, jinyang wrote:
Better safety policy: Use asynchronous writes on Windows: ALWAYS.
heLen
As you have corrected:synchronous!That's right.
If We have Better safety policy,but someone had dropped down the cliff.We should can save it.Is it ok?
I guess the option of forced writed may be can't insure that database aren't been corrupted.May be I am wrong.
jinyang.
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
国内电邮用户反垃圾调查拉开帷幕
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
At 12:50 PM 10/07/2003 +0800, jinyang wrote:
>Ann Harrison <aharrison@...> wrote:jinyang wrote
>
>Almost all the problems I've seen from Brazil are databases that were
>running with forced writes off on windows when the power failed. Hard
>to blame the database for that.
> I agree with the view that loss power make database corrupt.But IYour safety policy: ambulance at bottom of cliff.
> think It is most important to solve the problem by user when the database
> corrupt.
>
> How to restore the normal by user so that they can continual use the
> application?
>
> A tool is need to use by user to restore the corrupt database.Let's
> make it.
Better safety policy: Use asynchronous writes on Windows: ALWAYS.
heLen
As you have corrected:synchronous!That's right.
If We have Better safety policy,but someone had dropped down the cliff.We should can save it.Is it ok?
I guess the option of forced writed may be can't insure that database aren't been corrupted.May be I am wrong.
jinyang.
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
国内电邮用户反垃圾调查拉开帷幕
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]