Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Classic vs SuperServer |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2003-06-20T03:51:24Z |
At 02:48 AM 20/06/2003 +0000, you wrote:
http://www.ibphoenix.com/main.nfs?a=ibphoenix&page=ibp_ss_vs_classic
The recent Firebird beta 1.5 classic build is still very experimental. The
architectural comparison in the article above is valid, but the
implementation details for Windows aren't addressed (there hasn't been a
Windows Classic server since about 1996).
platform implementation stuff regarding betas is firebird-devel.
heLen
>Hi there.There is an article here:
>
>I posted a question yesterday regarding an issue with the 1.5
>installers.
>It hasn't been answered so I'm thinking I'm doing something foolish
>myself here.
>
>Could someone please point me to an article which explains the diff.
>between classic & SS? (on Windows)
http://www.ibphoenix.com/main.nfs?a=ibphoenix&page=ibp_ss_vs_classic
The recent Firebird beta 1.5 classic build is still very experimental. The
architectural comparison in the article above is valid, but the
implementation details for Windows aren't addressed (there hasn't been a
Windows Classic server since about 1996).
>Also, if this is not the appropriate group, could someone pleaseNo, it's not the right group. The list you want for installation and
>point me to it. (for questions regarding 1.5) I thought there was,
>but I can't see it in the forum list on ibpheonix.com
platform implementation stuff regarding betas is firebird-devel.
heLen