Hi Tobias!

Yes the CS seems to be a better choice - but performance issues
are far more complex
as only choosing CS or SS -
you may think about index design , raid disks (stripping brings a lot
gain at IO versus simple disk arrays)

yours

Claus



koehnlein wrote:

>Hello,
>
>our situation:
>- Intel XEON Server 1.8 GHz / 1 GB RAM / hardware raid 5 with 3 hdds
>(scsi) / 1000MBit network
>- Linux version 2.4.7-10smp (gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux
>7.1 2.96-98)) #1 SMP
>- FirebirdSS-1.0.0.681-0.RC2.64IO
>- database size about 11.5 GB on 10 files (8 in use)
>- about 60 users with about 10 concurrent connections
>
>The problem: performance is getting low
>
>Now my question: we think do migrate to FB 1.03 CS because we think
>- performance of one slow process does not affect the other processes
>that much like on SS
>- it's easier to locate the process which slows down the system
>
>Are we right???
>
>Is it possible to migrate to FB 1.03 CS without hot testing ? (our
>test system is running FB 1.5 RC3)
>(We switched from IB6.0 SS to IB6.0 CS and hat problems with "lock
>manager out of room" after 10 users were logged on - is this still a
>problem in FB 1.03 CS)
>
>Thank you for your answers!
>
>Tobias
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>firebird-support-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>.
>