Subject | Re: Update is Slow |
---|---|
Author | goonct |
Post date | 2003-06-10T06:44:15Z |
--- In ib-support@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...> wrote:
I have tried by committing it after update. then the subsequent
update process is faster, about 1min30sec. it is still consider slow.
any suggestion to improve it ?
rgds, chooi-ting
> At 09:58 AM 6/06/2003 +0000, you wrote:specifying
> >Helen,
> >
> >is there any way to clear all the garbage ?
>
> Yes. Do a backup, and then a restore with the -c(reate) option,
> a different name.rename
>
> Then, shut down the original database and rename it. (If you can't
> it, then it isn't stopped - someone is still logged in..)the
>
> Zip up the renamed database and save to CD or some other media.
>
> Rename the restored database to the original name and move it to
> correct location.being
>
> That's it.
>
> But you should definitely find out why your garbage collection is
> prevented. Look at your applications and user behaviour, to findout where
> and why transactions are being left unfinished - otherwise yourproblems
> will very soon recur.(IsIndyInitialized)? That
>
> Did you drop the index from that binary column
> is the *most obvious* reason why your update is slow. You shouldNOT index
> that column.I have dropped the index. Actually I don't index it at the beginning.
>
I have tried by committing it after update. then the subsequent
update process is faster, about 1min30sec. it is still consider slow.
any suggestion to improve it ?
rgds, chooi-ting
> heLen